If they said….
… that the first alive being formed by chance inside of fine crystal glass a carved does thousands of million years, nobody would believe to them. But what they do not say it is that mathematically it is million times but probable that a carved crystal glass forms by chance that an alive being.
If they said…
… that the ancestors of the man were hens, everybody would laugh. And nevertheless less structural changes are required to transform a hen into being human that a chimpanzee in being human.
If they said…
… that we are descending of one Pope because the genetics it test, we would ***reflx mng ourselves. Nevertheless the Pope has the same number of chromosomes that the human being and chimpanzee no. and all do not laugh themselves when they say that we are “related� with the chimpanzee due to the similar number of chromosomes.
If they said…
… that creyeramos that of a sterile atmosphere forms microorganisms sometimes, the sterilization processes would be absolutely useless and we would live infecting to us. And nevertheless they say with impunity that of a sterile planet microorganisms formed randomly.
If they said…
… that to live near a nuclear reactor to the fish of some side grew wings and legs to them, LUNATIC llamariamos them and the mandariamos to manicomio. But as they say that step makes million years when nobody was there for seeing it and still although they do not have the smaller sign of it we called PROFESSORS to them we placed and them in the universities.
If I leave and shout that the animal are estan transforming into human beings they would lock up to me. Shout arrives but it of a pulpit in a university would be a university professor of present Biology.
If they said the truth…
… they would say that the majority of the evolucionistas belongs to some religion. There are religions like the Anglican, the Catholicism and the faith Bahai who HAVE ACCEPTED OFFICIALLY the EVOLUCIONISMO in fact as she leaves of its doctrine and the explanation of our origins. So to be evolucionista it does not mean to be rational since the evolucionismo has prevailed with the help of the same religions that burned people in the bonfire or of other novel cults but and not for that reason but scientists.
If they said the truth…
… they would say that all that believes in God does not profess a religion. Many scientists think that the universe is product of the DESIGN OF a MIND who cannot understand and they do not create necessarily in the God of the Bible nor in any religion. Einstein is the well-known case but: the mind but shining of century XX (and perhaps of history) believed in a SUPREME DESIGNER although it did not belong to any religion and he was skeptical.
If they said some of these things the world he would be different. The world would think.
As Christian I do not propose that they teach a doctrine in the institutes of public education. I propose that THEY DO NOT TEACH ANY.
THE DARWINISMO WHEREAS PROVEN VIOLA IS NOT A SCIENCE THE LAICISM OF EDUCATION.
One would be due to simply teach in the training centers the facts and to leave each student interprets.
One would be due to say:
…. the first signs of life date, according to our inexact methods of measurement, from about 1000 million years back although these methods can have failures in the dating of a few to several hundreds of million. And not: THE LIFE BACK ORIGINATES BETWEEN 2500 MILLION AND 5000 MILLION YEARS. That he is that? A fact sustained in what? In seeming of whom? They teach personal beliefs in the schools with the money that we paid all instead of to teach provable cientÃtificos facts?
… it is IMPOSSIBLE to demonstrate scientifically as it appeared Earth life. This is the REALITY. The scientifically CORRECT thing. To say that it arose life in tal o cual date of tal o cual form is simply to speculate on according to a belief or predefined faith. but he is not the same thus accuse from obscurantism the Catholic Church of the average age? We suppose that the Dr. comes John Doe. It has 100 university titles. I no. But say to me that the life was exactly born 2507 million ago years in the middle of the mud. Insofar as mr John Doe cannot demonstrate it to me I have the same right that he to say that I do not create that and that creates another thing. HE IS NOT JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT THE SUN IS SPHERICAL OR THAT THE SKY IS CELESTIAL. He is not something that both we pruned to see and to verify.
The educative systems paint to the creacionistas like fanatics whom they try that religion in the universities is taught. Then the opposite is what we propose some. We propose, that teaches RELIGION, but DO NOT STOP DOING IT.
TO TEACH a THEORY THAT THIS VERIFIED NOR IS NOT DEMONSTRABLE (in spite of 200 years on attempts bankrupts to demonstrate it) AS IF OUTSIDE a FACT, IS TO DISTRIBUTE RELIGION.
THE TAUGHT ORGANIC EVOLUTION SINCE DONE VIOLATES THE LAICISM OF EDUCATION.
Some scientists think that there is life in other planets… teaches that like a fact in the universities? THEN NO, BECAUSE NOT THIS PROVEN ONE.
Some scientists think that in the black holes the time backs down and is possible to travel in the time by means of them. is taught that like a fact in the universities? THEN NO, BECAUSE IT IS ONLY A THEORY. NOT THIS PROVEN ONE.
Some scientists think that innumerable parallel realities coexist next to us. is taught that like a fact in the universities? NOT BECAUSE IT IS ONLY A THEORY. NOT THIS VERIFIED.
And nevertheless…
Some scientists think that the species are transformed by means of random mutations into other species and that the life was originated at random in a remote past like a chemical reaction with all their complexity including the DNA. Is taught that in the universities? THEN IF, IT IS TAUGHT LIKE A FACT.
THE TESTS FOR THIS LAST THEORY ARE EVEN LESS THAN THE TESTS THAN EXIST FOR THE THEORY OF THE BLACK HOLES.
You think that to a boy to an adolescent or a young person she is due to distribute to him since DONE ESTABLISHED the controversial theory of a group of scientists although she is not verified? He is not that the same to that they taught to that person RELIGION to him like an obligatory matter?
Humanity: it is hour of which we advance towards a new skepticism where the great means always do not sell to us what to the powers it serves to them: It is hour to eradicate the evolutionary darwinismo, that pseudo science, that neon religion that as much has served to the dictators as all the colors and the powers.
Shalom
