Often when studying the Bible we forgot that what we have in our hands is a TRANSLATION OF the BIBLE and not it SAME BIBLE.
Thus he is brother: when tenth THIS IS the BIBLE, this is not completely correct. Clear that the use and the custom cause that I take “my Bible� before leaving, that “reads in my Bible� some text every morning, but correct and the exact thing would be to say on that book in Spanish which we took with us, “This is the BIBLE…. TRANSLATED THE SPANISH�
Or to put it another way, “this is one traducciòn of the Bible�. And this does not clear an apex to him of value to the word of God. But it must be a constant reminder to exert caution being remembered that by means of the translations we tried to establish the pure sense of the Word of God, not being the translations the Word of God in if since the books which they compose the Bible were written originally in Hebrew, Greek and part of Arameo.
It is so, by influence of the great religions and customs, sometimes reflections are generated conditional that get to contaminate the own translators who adapt texts to the original sense but to which “they do not understand� the original Bible quizo to say. They understand but it on the basis of what? Possibly to enselanzas of some of the many sects and religions that they affirm to have interpreted the Bible, and not of the same Bible. This is very certain of the case of the book of Hebrew where we read if it literally, free of all prejudice and comparing a translation with another one, we managed to see a panorama totally different from which is taught in the churches of the figure of Jesus de Nazaret.
We have already seen first versicles of the book of Hebrew, for which I propose the following paraphrase (maintained in the general context of the Bible)
“God already use human beings to speak to us in the past, is those that we meet as the prophets then did and it of different ways not all the prophets were equal. Not it is rare since man speaks us now again by means of and not by means of angel, because they know that to the being the MesÃas all the stages of the present and future humanity were even allowed and created because of Him, and I say that they were created FOR because this man is the heir of all the things and not an angel or spirit as we are going to see throughout this letter. â€?
That is the sense of first two versicles of Hebrew where it prepares for a series of comparisons between Jesus and the spiritual beings to us, Los Angeles, the spirits… where it is tried to us to explain HOW and Why a human being of meat and bone, Jesus, gets to be superior and to have but authority that the spiritual beings who have been created in the sky.
, In summary Hebrew it says the reason to us for which Jesus got to be superior to Los Angeles… by being able, nature? No. It says clearly that it was BY RANK, by POSITION.
“It has gotten to be superior at Los Angeles ..... (why? ANSWER:) BECAUSE IT HAS RECEIVED IN INHERITANCE IMPORTANT a MAS TITLE THAT THE ONE OF THEM� (Hebrew 1:4, DHH)
(It could argue what finishes to us saying, the HEBREWS OF the FIRST CENTURY for those who the letter was written, like is possible that a MAN finishes being superior to Los Angeles that has lived with God during so many thousands on years and that they were there at the time of the creation? ANSWER: Clear that yes. they listen…)
“God never said to an angel “Your you are my son, I I have generated to you today� (Hebrew 1:5) (as it says here in the Psalm 2:7, leánlo you yourself Hebrews…. This already is a great difference: Los Angeles HAS BEEN CREATED by GOD, but NO WAS GENERATED)
This text would only be enough to hechar by earth the false doctrine of gnóstico origin of the “incarnation of Jesus�. If Jesus had been a spirit who lived in the sky before being born in the Earth, then Jesus would not be different from Los Angeles in it… Jesus WOULD HAVE BEEN CREATED, and NOT GENERATED. There would not be difference between Jesus and Los Angeles, unless somebody shows a Biblical text to me where the existence of a woman in the sky is described by means of which God could GENERATE and not simply TO CREATE Jesus.
Since the author of Hebrew says that one of but the great differences between Jesus and Los Angeles is that Jesus WAS GENERATED, put in a MATRIX OF WOMAN and Los Angeles (and the writer does not defy the readers to that they give an example him because asks: To which of Los Angeles he said sometimes YOUR YOU ARE MY SON, I HAVE GENERATED to YOU TODAY)
It is very logical that he mentions this after to have said that Jesus was appointed INHERITING OF ALL THE THINGS, even of the Universe. We remember that the rights of inheritance in the Jewish town (and the majority of the towns clear) come from a birth and they fall generally on the first-born. The first BORN son man (NOT CREATED, but BEEN BORN) was the NATURAL FIRST-BORN.
He has very many sense that remembers that one to us of the reasons for which the heir of everything is Jesus, he is because HE WAS GENERATED and therefore God (the Owner of everything what exists) exerts a LITERAL paternity on Jesus, which does not exert by no other being of the universe and in the case of Los Angeles less still since Los Angeles HAS NOT BEEN GENERATED, but CREATED.
There are two possibilities as far as the origin of Jesus:
1 - Fuen generated in the Earth
2 - It was created in the sky
They cannot be both. If it were created in the sky, in the Earth it was not born: it was incarnated, or what they want to call. But definitively nonNACIO. IT WAS NOT GENERATED, it was transferred or what they want but NOT GENERATED. So or a thing or the other. Jesus cannot have two origins: or he began to exist of a way or another one. They read ALL THE BIBLE and diganme what of the two is the one that clearly is taught: if the history of a being created in the sky and transferred to the Earth or the history of a man generated by Earth God in a woman.
If Jesus WERE CREATED, Psalms 2:7 lie because it says that (reads well)
GOD GOT TO BE FATHER WHEN JESUS WAS GENERATED
We read again:
“Your you are my son… I I HAVE GENERATED to you TODAY�
IT DOES NOT SAY: “Your already eras my son, but I have generated to you today�
HE DOES NOT SAY: “Your you are my son, I I have created to you today�
It says:
“YOUR (Jesus) YOU ARE MY SON (Of God). I (God) HAVE GENERATED to you (not created) TODAY�
If Jesus were created, he cannot be inheriting of God, because God would not be his natural Father, nor Jesus its natural son, its FIRST-BORN, its UNIGÉNITO.
For that reason the book of Hebrew one of the things that leave but clear, the first difference that it establishes between Jesus and Los Angeles (which is called “children of God� also in the writings) is that, unlike Los Angeles WAS GENERATED, in the belly of a woman.
Where? IN THE EARTH.
Was God the Father of Jesus before it? NO, because I say “Your you are my son TODAY I HAVE GOTTEN TO BE YOUR FATHER�
They are two events that happen in unison: God generates, Jesus is generated. God gets to be Father, Jesus gets to be son. God is the OWNER OF the UNIVERSE, Jesus gets to be the HEIR of the Universe.
And there is nothing in the writing that can contradict this beautiful reality. And all the book of Hebrew does not make but explain it, emphasize it, and develop it.
A Jesus created in the sky… is not our Jesus.
A Jesus arcángel… is not our Jesus.
A Jesus spirit… is not our Jesus.
However:
A Jesus GENERATED AND BORN IN the Earth. That is our Jesus!
A Jesus MAN… That is our Jesus!
A Jesus of MEAT AND BONE… That is our Jesus!
Amen.
