“The mutations are the key of our evolution. It has allowed us to happen to be an organism of a cell to dominate the planet. This process is slow taking sometimes thousands from million years. But sometimes it happens very fast� (introduction of the film MEN X… If you create possible that a type is born with chicken wings, it will not be difficult to believe to you of course in the theory of the evolution. But. that is science)
If, THEORY THREE TIMES so that they remember. ORGANIC addition so that it is not confused with the general concept of EVOLUTION (is not the same to say that a society evolves industrially that to say that a species evolves organic: it is a silly thing to connect a thing with another one as if they had to do but from the ERASE small drawing ONCE the MAN continues itself committing the same error).
How different is the world to as people create friendly! The majority of the people estan misinformed in the peak of the era of the information. As CHRISTIAN nothing we must fear to the information, the INFORMATION the KNOWLEDGE is our ally, inasmuch as we are carrying of the truth revealed by the creator NOTHING WE FEAR of the analysis of the reality, because the reality that surrounds to us is explained by the truth that was revealed to us.
In order to inagurar this section I am going to define some concepts without only entering discussions (still) so that it is clear that we are going to speak here.
They are going to see that I mention much something that stops my is “the obscurantism of the modern age� and that is given in calling DARWINISMO or but frequently EVOLUCIONISMO (although many of their defenders are autodefinen in fact like NEON DARWINIST assuming by all means the obvious thing and is that the theories of Darwin as express Darwin them long ago cannot be maintained still on by but muletas that puts to them and assuming that from Darwin only takes we say the central argument).
This system of beliefs promulgates like central idea three “absolute truths�:
- the universe formed fortuitously by means of a disorderly explosion and without planetary direction and all the systems and galaxies they were in orbit by fortuitous and random processes
- the life spontaneously formed in the planet earth like a chemical reaction
- all the forms of life that we know went randomly forming with all components (wings, eyes, brain, pens, hairs, claws, liver, páncreas, ear, cerebellum, circulatory system, fins that is EVERYTHING what it moves and it breathes) also by means of occasional and not planned mutations of which the species were retaining only the beneficial mutations (approximately the 1 percent) and eliminating the injurious ones (the 70 percent more or less) and if to leave signs of the neutral ones (the 29 remaining percent). All this happened without another factor took part that the TIME. Nobody directed the procedure. Concepts like “where there is water will form life� or “in good time everything is possible� are constant clich3es in the language of the evolucionistas.
If not outside because the same system was adopted on the one hand influential of the scientific community, the notion of which EL TIEMPO (CRONOS) is CREATIVE OF EVERYTHING and that the animal are transformed with time others and into humans, would sound but to strange esoteric religion that to science. But of the hand of the political but popular movements of century XIX and XX that totally assumed the theories of justificatory and legitimante Darwin like for natural situations con like the genocide and the war, the Darwinismo collection status of OFFICIAL RELIGION de facto. They adopted it to the governors, systems imposed the educative it. SOCIAL call DARWINISMO was the theory behind the COMUNISM, of NAZISM, the FASCISM and also (by all means) of WILD CAPITALISM.
- The Communists reasoned that the Darwinismo was useful to explain the fight of classes and the social evolution. Also he was useful like alternative to the religion like explanation of the origin of the life and the universe.
- The Nazis reasoned that he was absolutely natural who a race superior eradicated to the races inferiors. after all the nature he awards to the forts and he punishes to the weak ones. Behind concepts like eugenesia, euthanasia and whichever barbarism committed the Nazis was the shade of Darwin. After all… if science says to me that we got to be what we are on the corpses of which are different or but weak, which is the moral dilemma to kill the other races? Only estariamos practicing the “natural selection�… Or no?
- The capitalists obvious consider the SURVIVAL OF the APT MAS like a central truth of all the system. If somebody starves, that teases. He had to be but “apt�: We are evolving and only but “the apt ones survive�.
History sample that the governors adopt the religions that serve to them. And in a century like the XX where it was lived in struggle between these three systems: Comunism, fascism and Capitalism are not rare that a religion that was to the liking of the three transformed soon into the OFFICIAL RELIGION as the catholic church was the official religion of ALL THE OBSCURANTISM because it was lent to the interests of the monarchic systems.
AVERAGE AGE:
Official religion: catholicism
Utility: “The king is chosen by God and is necessary to obey it blindly. It does not matter to be poor, after morirte you are going to go to a paradise to enjoy everything what the king has now and your not�
Now:
MODERN AGE:Official religion: darwinismo
Utility: “Commerce Is necessary to kill to the race enemies/class/because it sends it to the nature. Chinese Germans are not bad to kill Jewish/black landlords//competing///ponloquequierasaqui because it is part of STRONG the natural selection where only the MAS (that is, we member capitalist Nazi them communist///of tal o cual ethnic group)
Creanme that if to the effective systems of century XX it had served to his purposes the theories to them as Lewis Carrol, ALICIA IN the COUNTRY OF the WONDERS today would be a science book and not a story book. But like the writer who served to them was Charles Darwin, that youngster without any scientific formation to who obvious we will call “naturalist� for want of another title in all the works of history (which translated means that it passed the time watching birds clearly and the nature… if, the Eulalia aunt also is naturalist) but to which we will give the same degree him of authority that to Newton (who yes creia in God and which proved its existence to several of its friendly) whose formation can rarely be surpassed by another scientist of the history, or that to Servet or that to any other previous scientist. Because this NATURALISTIC youngster has the advantage of which he brings something that acts two as:
- he is useful to the powers (of all the colors)
- she says what people want to listen
Darwin fulfills requisite previous both of any official religion then. Useful to the powers, he says what simple people want to listen. If says that it. the people of century XX wanted to get rid of God not to have to that to render accounts to him. and I understand partly them: the concept of God that had raised the religion was so castrante, so mysterious, so threatening that any explanation that not outside “God� sounded well. So we added to the analogy with the average age:
AVERAGE AGE:
Official religion: Catholicism
Utility for the town: “It is a consolation for all the evils that we have. After to die we will live in the sky always happy�
Now:
MODERN AGE
Official religion: darwinismo
Utility for the town: “I can do what it is sung to me: to rob, to lie, to fornicar… total. I do not have to give accounts to nobody. I am product of the chance so I do not have but felt that. The other harian the same in my place. God does not exist: �
It is clear since IT IS NOT RARE that the Darwinismo has been the official religion of all the century XX and than goes of the 21st century. People do not look for the truth, but the convenience and that are an historical fact. The obscurantism lasted centuries. the new Darwinist obscurantism comes already lasting but from a century. But as well as all in the average age did not swallow the official religion and were many dissidents, NOT ALL THE MEN OF SCIENCE AND REASON of the present time creates in the “theory of the evolution�, that theory that is embraced since DONE by some and elevated to the really absolute degree as any other religion without having empirical evidence maintains that it.
Without evidence some….
Surprised friend? You are not surprised. I repeat what has been said: THERE IS NO CONCLUSIVE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, NO EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE THEORY OF THE EVOLUTION. If there were, nondiriamos THEORY of the evolution. We would be speaking of the LAW OF the EVOLUTION. But their defenders (who usually are not very objectives and in that anything they must envy his catholic predecessors) cannot even simply call to their faith LAW OF the EVOLUTION because beyond which THEY CANNOT DEMONSTRATE IT either they can EXPLAIN IT.
No evolucionista scientist can explain in a blackboard:
- how the life from inanimate matter formed
- which is the process by means of which a species is transformed into another one
To explain that is to say, “in the water habia molecules key a ray and I do not form life�. It is not either explanation to say: “the fish were changing until grew legs to them and amphibians became�. That is simply to count, like that counts a story. With the same lightness I can say “the doves got fat and they could not fly and they were transformed into fish� (which obvious haria that they enchalequen to me if I am a scientist) or “revolvi escupida in the floor and this caused that a worm formed�.
To explain is that a scientist shows to me exactly (so far without tests, that it only shows) AS the life formed. That is to say, NAMES HORSEMEN NAMES. How formed the amino acids? How formed the DNA? How formed the first unicellular organism? So that it causes these organisms transformed themselves into multicellular? It is not only to say they did that it. it is necessary to explain the scientific reason of as clear form as Newton did when she explained why an apple falls to the ground and I formulate his LAW (nontheory, LAW) of the GRAVITY.
Some things that would not be of but remembering when reading this blog. Although the evolucionistas affirm that:
The theory of the evolution is:
Scientific theory that it tries about the fact of the biological evolution and the mechanisms explain that it.
http://symploke.trujaman.org/index.php?title=Teor%EDa_de_la_evoluci%F3n
The certain thing is that a THEORY is not just like a FACT:
A scientific theory, on the other hand, is the exposition of a hypothetical-deductive abstract system, that conforms a scientific description of a set of observations or experiments. The scientific theory is based on supposed hypotheses or verified by scientists.
http://definicion.de/teoria/
I leave to sale when granting to them THEORY them since as we see a THEORY must be founded on observable facts and NO SCIENTIST NEVER OBSERVED the SMALLER EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS neither in experience of field nor in a laboratory: that is NOBODY NEVER SAW a NEW BODY APPEAR IN an ORGANISM way to another species. But we avoid the obvious thing (the THEORY OF the EVOLUTION is in fact one HYPOTHESIS as they maintain several scientists), hagamosle price to the darwinismo by this time and we read…
To say that the THEORY OF the EVOLUTION tries about the FACT OF the EVOLUTION is like saying that the THEORY THAT the FLIGHT 93 ESTRELLARIA AGAINST the STATUE OF the FREEDOM is of the confirmed fact that FLIGHT 93 WAS GOING AWAY TO STAR IN the STATUE OF the FREEDOM. That is it is not a confirmed fact: it is a theory that some have based in which they observed. It is not known for sure. And nevertheless they notice the Darwinist language: “SCIENTIFIC THEORY THAT to put it another way DEALS WITH the FACT OF the EVOLUTION� Or “IS a FACT THAT DEALS WITH the FACT�. That sounds to science or to religion?
it sounds but to PAPAL INFALIBILIDAD that to scientific method. He is because a Christian said that the Bible is the book that says to us that it is the Word of God. and as it is the Word of God we must believe to him because God does not lie. That is that type of circles is not part of a rational mind and the darwinismo borrowed them to its preceding universal religion: the catholicism.
A Christian does not need DOGMAS. He has EVIDENCES. A Christian thinks that the Bible is the demonstrable revelation of God to the humanity based on empirical evidence and facts and not one or two, but thousands of facts that cannot be explained of another way. But that will be subject of another article. The important thing is here that the Darwinist ones cannot say the same and fall in “IS the THEORY THAT DEMONSTRATES THAT THIS THEORY IS a FACT�. And that is SWEEPINGS. It is not science.
Another thing that is worth the pain to remember is that, although the “fact of the evolution� occurs by seated in whichever class and book lanze the educative system of the present obscurantism, and in fact it is compared to this theory with the laws of the gravity and the physics. We are going to see… what so defined is this scientific FACT?
We would suppose that they have clarisimo at least WHEN the things happened. I say: in order to affirm something than there is evidence nor no sign, since we are at least podriamos to throw a unified date, something that convinces to me that the observation was based on provable facts we say, in archaeological evidence. He is interesting to notice what diverse sources say on the same “scientific FACT�:
When formed the life?
Sir professor… he could explain to me by means of which chemical process formed this in the mud at some time does between 5000 million years and 2500 million years back and how you did you stop to know it? Thanks. (to trim and to take to the school)
Results of GOOGLE looking for the date of the origin of the life…
Increase Education
The life began in the Earth makes 3,500 million years more or less, and since then the planet has continued its untiring evolution, until arriving at…
www.creces.cl/new/index.asp?imat=%20%20%3E%20%209&tc=3&nc=5&art=919 - 79k - Cached - Similar pagesTHAT - Kids - Our Universe - At the beginning
The old rock studies demonstrate that the life began in the Earth does near 3,800 million years. At that time, the Earth was a place…
www.esa.int/esaKIDSes/SEMMSRWJD1E_OurUniverse_0.html - 14k - Cached - Similar pagesMarcel.là Antúnez Rock - Website: TRANSPERMIA dossier txt ESP
The scientists affirm that there are outlines (estomatolitos) that demonstrate that the life began in the Earth makes three thousand six hundred million years; …
www.marceliantunez.com/tikiwiki/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=98 - 29k - Cached - Similar pagesHuman evolution
The life began in the Earth before does 4 billions of years or. The first tracks of rock organisms date from 1000 million years. …
eigr.grupoei.com/paginas/diccionario/evolucionhumana.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pagesOrigin and evolutionary History of the life
time: the age of the Earth calculates in 4600 million years and the old vestiges of life but date from 3,800 million years, so that the “life�…
fai.unne.edu.ar/biologia/introduccion/origen.htm - 52k - Cached - Similar pagesOldest Crystal on Earth - Crystalinks
Current research holds that life appeared on Earth 3.9 billion years ago. “Our results raise the possibility that to biosphere could have arisen on Earth 400…
www.crystalinks.com/oldestcrystal.html - 7k - Cached - Similar pages
Which is the predecessor of the man?
We see some “facts� that teach the evolucionistas in diverse schools:
The man of Neanderthal veia THUS and is itself a FACT THAT VEIA thus according to several books of science. If you say the opposite in a school that uses those books you remove a 0, For example. if you say that he was red-haired and white and human .....
Also it is a fact that veia thus according to other books of science… and if you go away to a school that uses those books and you say that it was a species of crosses between a Klingom and Great Pie as the one of the then previous photo you would remove a 0. But it remembers: we are in a world like the one of the GENTLEMAN OF the RING where the variables of the human being are infinite.
The man of Neanderthal. he is grandfathers ours. or no? Results search…
“Young… I want that they respond if the Man of Neanderthal were an ancestor of the modern human being according to provable scientific sources. “, diria a professor. Pity that we are in the era of the information and until the vague boy but can look for in thousands of mentioned scientific sources and respectable in million pages in Internet. Pity for the day that profe takes the class because the answers will be:
IF IT WERE IT PROFE
Fossil Neandertal man, ancestors prehistory Steven caverns…
The man of Neandertal, ancestor of the modern man who lived… the most probable one is than the neandertal, that already counted on vocal cords…
es.geocities.com/dinox203/gale4/7jun05.htm - 77k - Cached - Similar pages
IT WAS NOT IT PROFE- [Translate this page] 19.1997) Pääbo says that for this finding they do not have another interpretation, but the man of Neanderthal is not the ancestor of the European modern man. …
www.creces.cl/new/index.asp?imat=%20%20%3E%20%207&tc=3&nc=5&art=662 - 59k -IF IT WERE IT PROFE
:: Aceprensa:: The Neanderthal, rehabilitated
Many scientific ones already thought that something similar had happened, and saw present inherited characteristics of the Neanderthales in the European. Also they affirm that the characteristics characteristic of the Neanderthales enter within the limits of variation of the present population. They say that we would not be surprised absolutely if we saw by the street a Neanderthal dressed like us,http://www.aceprensa.com/articulos/1995/feb/22/el-neanderthal-rehabilitado/IT WAS NOT IT PROFEThe man of Neanderthal would not be our ancestor - Axxón…
6 Jun the 2006… man of Neanderthal would not be our ancestor a group of investigaciónfrancés affirms that he is not the direct ancestor of the man…
axxon.com.ar/not/163/c-1630046.htm - 13k - Cached - Similar pages
Darwin, when the origin of the species wrote, did not know
existence of the genes, (that is that I base all their theory on a false premise) and supposed that the hereditary characters, that
they could acquire new selectable potentialities, were
diffuse in the sanguineous torrent. When it was discovered that
hereditary characters were separated in the genes, was put in doubt
that they could appear advantageous mutations at random (that is, the scientific mind gave account that Darwin was mistaken and by all means what they did she was… to admit the error? To prove a new theory? We read….) with as much speed as to have given rise to all the evolutionary fact, mainly with respect to the appearance of nonquantitative changes but
qualitative, as well as of new characters. But to forget the chance supposed to admit the causality, which always ends up sending to one
ordenadora mind (that is GOD, found evidence that GOD EXISTIA… but. obvious not them then taste and: ). For that reason the neoDarwinist theory was createdhttp://www.aceprensa.com/articulos/1995/feb/22/el-neanderthal-rehabilitado/
(the text in BLUE is addition by my. calm I do not need to hide nothing
)
Interesting “fact� the one of evolution… based on theory original of youngster without formation scientific of for two centuries that creia that the acquired characteristics were in the blood (that is Darwin creia that if you cut an arm, your son naceria with the cut arm because your blood tendria memory of which you cut an arm), the present one was formulated when they realized that first was erroneous with the unique reason for not admitting that the evidence aimed at a theory that they did not like (MIND ORDENADORA).
That is science or religion?
We suppose that I say that the ocean floor is yellow, based in which a boy of century XIX went the life observing the stars because creia that the stars trasmitian their yellowish color to the sea. We suppose that I either that nor the stars are themselves yellow nor pass on color to the ocean floor and that more likely the ocean floor is brown or gray but I detest the gray color and the brown one and insist with the yellow saying that it is a make to only be or with my colleagues, my president and because the people who read to me wish with all the soul to think that the ocean floor is yellow.
That is science or religion?
, The things are not well what they seem. And in this blog (as in very many others) we are going humbly to give a little voice to that argument that CRUDELY HAS BEEN SILENCED BY the POWER. The Darwinist ones own the official voice, the official channels of TV, and dominate the official educative system. equal to the catholics in the average age. He is not accidental that the Catholic Church accepts the darwinismo since a FACT and has written an encyclical on the matter. He is not accidental that does a few days Anglican the Church derived from the catholic would publicly apologize to Darwin to deny its theory. It is not accidental because the DARWINISMO and the RELIGIONS serve the same powers, use same means and show the same conduct. They are relatives.
And we, those that WE DO NOT CREATE IN the ORGANIC EVOLUTION are a dissident minority. IN which there are MILLION science men. MILLION reason men. In fact you would notice that in opposition to the myth who foment the evolucionistas the reality is that less is informed in subjects into science the person who defines itself as “evolucionista� that the person who defines itself as “creacionista�. The majority of the people who believe in the organic evolution which I know has said things to me because of the rotten meat worms form (something that tried on false does muuuuuuuucho), that coxis is a tail sign that had the human being (another triviality who the same evolucionistas generally deny already long ago), that the acquired characteristics go to the children (and if. the mind of Darwin continues weighing. lady: she pongase the calm silicone chests. She will never have a daughter with the great bust but for that reason) and things of the sort. As far as dates they do not have the smaller going. The evolucionista average the only thing that says is “we come from the monkey� and it does not have desire to speak of the subject. Others already thought by, and he obtains from his religion the necessary opium that he is in this case: GOD DOES NOT EXIST, WE COME FROM the ready MONKEY and. That is everything what needs to know how to develop its hedonismo peacefully.
The unique facts with respect to the theory of the evolution…
But although we face enormous powers and a TREMENDOUS social ignorance as never the humanity has seen from the average age, we are going to make listen to the other voice in the subject. Because the Internet is free it allows and it and here we have the same means that they. And we are going to speak to him to the people of FACTS not of THEORIES.
- It is a FACT that the evolution NEVER WAS DEMONSTRATED and that in the best one of the cases it is only a THEORY
- It is a FACT that the majority of the FACTS that affirms that theory contradicts to each other, from a year to another one, from a scientist to another one, from a country to another one and from a book to another one.
- It is a FACT that the hypotheses on which it developed Darwin their theory originally have been demonstrated false. Darwin never would have devised the evolution if she had known that the characteristics are not inherited and what they are the genes and the DNA.
- It is a FACT that the great powers of the humanity have seen beneficiaries (especially the great dictators) of this theory.
- It is a FACT that this theory is dominated the FORCE as if outside a FACT and never never is mentioned with respect to her “we suppose such thing�, “we create another one so�: Everything is a fact: even what it is contradicted with other facts, EVERYTHING TREATS LIKE FINAL WORD.
These are done. The evidence is above. Still I did not speak of CREATION. Nor I entered the land of molecular Biology, or the physics. I am only making an introduction so that certain truths that have been covered during decades are clear.
Already established this, in this section we will speak of the called religion THEORY OF the EVOLUTION, will speak of the existence of GOD like scientific theory (not like religious fact, no. But GOD LIKE SCIENTIFIC THEORY based on visible facts) and of other things that usually is not spoken in Spanish.
Greetings to all and welcomes. This is going away to put good: I promise them.
