Category files for Unit of God

The book of Hebrew (III): the basic things the FAITH IN GOD

If I say that to believe to them in a single God, unique, indivisible and incomparable it is a obviedad in the Bible I am saying something that any reader can appreciate if he abre simply it and Lee so what is.

But I am in addition saying something that the own Bible says: the writer of Hebrew in his chapter 6, versicle 1, makes an exhortation towards the Christians to follow the maturity in the knowledge ahead. And he asks to them that please that does not back down as far as the knowledge, and he puts an example:  that they do not return to the basic things.

Between those basic things that the writer of Hebrew considers the first things that a believer learns, which the same finishes spiritually calling spiritual MILK, that is to say food of spiritual INFANTS in contrast to the solid food reserved to the mature people (Hebrew 5:11 - 14), between those OBVIOUS things that they would have to be in the “cover of the book� for whatever to afir to be Christian is the following education to me:

“THE FAITH IN GOD�

(Hebrew 6:1)

Thus he is, the writer enumerates a basic list of lessons to which no longer they would have to back return to discuss and such are: the 1 - the conversion, 2 - abandonment of the works that take to the death, 3 - the faith in God.

They are the elementary things, the basic ones, the base. The obviedades.   However it is obvious also that the writer mentions between those basic things the FAITH (singular) IN GOD (singular)

To think that GOD IS ONE, to have FAITH IN GOD (and not in GODS) is part of the basic thing, the obvious thing, of first that a Christian must know and possibly in times where the politeĂ­sta paganism was dominant in the empire it runs was part of first that a Christian had to teach to a potential disciple:

- Sight, is A SINGLE GOD.

-How one only? No. are many. This Zeus, is Apolo, is human demigods who are half and Gods half who lowered to the Earth, this Hera…

- He does not watch. You must understand that “although there are many Gods calls in the sky or the Earth, as well as are many Gods and many gentlemen (in that sense), for us (the Christians) there is A SINGLE GOD. (1 Corintios 8:5)

- Who is that God?

- For us there is A SINGLE GOD, the father. And there is a single (leader) or Gentleman (1 Corintios 8:5)

- Ah yes? And who is that leader whom they have? We have many leaders and gentlemen, philosophers, emperors…

- For us “There is a single Mr. Jesus Christ�. (1 Corintios 8:5)

Lamentably we lived in an era of NEOpoliteísmo.  Thus it is, nominally NO religion is politeísta. Not even the Hindus, having MILLION Gods in their pantheon assume that they are politeístas. They affirm that all million Gods are not but that manifestations several of A SINGLE GOD. In fact its supreme deity is the TRIMURTI, a deity TRINA AND ONE, a conceptually equal divisible God to the God that the catholics and protestants adore when in his churches they call “santísima to him Trinidad� to that conjución of three THAT in a single WHAT, that is to that conjución of FATHER, SON and SPIRIT SANTO in a single DEITY of which neither idea nor definition able to be understood the less still preached have notion.

In the 21st century the mesianistas we are in the same situation that in the first century: we need to explain the basic truth: GOD IS ONE. The book of Hebrew mentions this like a foundation, something that any Christian would have to give until by seated.

And nevertheless, nowadays, within those who only affirm to be Christian a smallest minority believes in the existence of A SINGLE GOD.

And here we must be categorical: those that affirms that the FATHER is GOD, that JESUS is GOD also and that the SPIRIT SANTO is GOD are POLITEISTAS. He does not matter what because says, the explanation is subjective and implies that to understand it I I must turn me to the point of view of them. We are going to see it thus. In the table in front of my I have 3 glasses. For the rest of the world they are 3 glasses. If I have the strange belief (or madness) to affirm that the 3 glasses in fact are one only because they contain the same drink this the one is MY PROBLEM not of that listens to me.

The catholicism then and the Protestantism are religions POLITEISTAS. That is an objective truth. The witnesses of Jehovah also profess a TRUE religion POLITEISTA since their faith TWO GODS one of greater hierarchy and another one of smaller hierarchy enter, but TWO GODS to the aim TWO GODS BY NATURE. For them Jesus is “a God�, is not which simply “a God is called�, but IT IS IT.

If Jesus is a GOD, and Yavé its Father also is GOD, then there are TWO GODS besides which they affirm that one is superior and another one is inferior. He is like the politeísta grecoromana religion: they had Zeus who was the SUPREME one, perhaps and Apolo was inferior and son of Zeus but it was “a God� and thus other hundreds but. For that reason they were politeístas.

To be politeĂ­sta implies to think that MAS OF a GOD in any sense EXISTS.

To be monotheist implies to think that GOD, by nature and definition only exists ONE, without peros nor exceptions.  And to understand that this is thus although “many are called Gods in the sky and the Earth�, that is that is possible that something or somebody IS CALLED God without being it in the sky or the Earth.

It implies to think that in spite of it for “us� (and when saying we feel a clear barrier between those who accept this and that not) THERE IS A SINGLE GOD, and that unique GOD IS the FATHER. It says Bible to it clearly thousands of times, in no as clearly as 1 Corintios 8:5. And Hebrew it calls something basic, something to which no longer would have to be returning.  The theologian of Hebrew says with a defrauded tone:

“after as much time already you would have to be masterful� (Hebrew 5:12)

He is like watching ours around and imagining to us: after 200 years, the called churches Christian either would have to be masterful of the gospel, or would have to be announcing the arrival of the Mesías, preaching the salvation of Israel. And nevertheless it is necessary to return to teach basic… among them the FAITH to them IN GOD.

IN A GOD.

IN A SINGLE GOD.

He is frustrating also. Instead of being able to focus to us with that they own a Bible in deepening in the own gospel of the Kingdom, as to the politeĂ­stas of any time we must begin to explain to them that there is A SINGLE GOD.

But as it says Hebrew 6:3:

“We will do it to This if it allows it to God�

God only can allow that a person sees the obvious thing, because we already know that their eyes have been blinded. The manna grass seeded by the devil has sunk which they try or they create to follow Jesus in 2000 years of debate around the basic thing. To which the Jews have known during thousands of years and we followed, the Jews in spiritual sense, knowing still today: that God, is ONE ONLY.

We will do it if God, to the ONLY allows it GOD. We pray for that reason and without being discouraged we return to the basic thing because it is fundamental that all know that there is A SINGLE GOD in the universe. We did not create that this that is obvious for us is it for the world, even for that then affirm to be Christian these are even those that usually are but completely without information in this subject as if the devil had paid them but attention.

For example a Muslim has a concept of the monotheism and the unit of much more clear God that a protestant and a catholic. And he is little what this religion takes from the Bible. Only “the heard� taking of. It was the version of the Bible that the founder of this religion, Mahoma, listened to of lips and histories of nestorianos priests. These heard were sufficient so that the Islam was STRICTLY MONOTEISTA. TO ONLY HEAR speak of the Bible takes to the conclusion that the God of that book is ONE ONLY.

Nor that to speak to read it (thing that all the churches would have to often do but)

Shalom

Tags: , , , ,

The God, God and Gods… he is all the same?

He knows why Jesus IS NOT “the� God.

In my country, Uruguay, are thousands of presidents. I suppose that in all the countries of the world the same happens: there are thousands, perhaps in some cases MILLION presidents.

Certainly to you reader this phrase sounded to him rare, strange. But it is truth. I will mention some presidents to him of Uruguay:

- The president of the Procardias Association
- The president of the Commission of Promotion of the School number 38
- The president of some political party
- The president of the $chamber of $industry

To all of them he is called PRESIDENTS to them and exert functions of presidents. Nevertheless when I said to him that in Uruguay “there are many presidents� you remained watching the screen as saying… and this became crazy?

For a simple reason. You and I know that, in fact, in Uruguay thus in capital letters, there is A SINGLE PRESIDENT. When I say the PRESIDENT OF URUGUAY, I talk about the Dr. Tabaré Vasquez (in this case) because he is the one that shows the position of president by antonomasia. If I do not clarify, if I do not add additional data like for example “president of such thing�, if I only say “President�, or “President of Uruguay�, if I say Tomorrow for example “will visit the President� obvious people suppose that I talk about the UNIQUE PRESIDENT of the country, although am not less certain that there are many calls presidents, but for us, the Uruguayan, there is a single president: Tabaré Vasquez.

This that I finish saying is clear, understandable and logical. A Colombian could say for example:

“Although there are many are called Presidents in Colombia (as well as there are many leaders and presidents), really for us the Colombians is a single President, Alvaro Uribe, who governs the country, and a single vice-president, Francisco Holy, by means of who he governs when he is not present�

That is so clear that in a single paragraph I realize of how is organized the authority in Colombia or any other country. Now we suppose that I read in the press of Colombia, talking about to certain organization “the president, Juan Perez�. I ask to them. some person in her healthy judgment would reason the following thing?

1-Juan Perez is Alvaro Uribe, but they are not two people but a single. And upon this, the vice-president also is a person along with them.

2 - Juan Perez is the president of Colombia, Uribe is the president of Colombia and Pedro Rodriguez (who never is called president don't mention it) also is the president of Colombia, but three Colombia does not only have president but one because the three are in fact one.

If I said that, would finish in a mental institution.  The explanation of why Juan Perez is called president I have it in the previous sentence:

“Although there are many are called Presidents in Colombia (as well as there are many leaders and presidents), really for us the Colombians is a single President, Alvaro Uribe, who governs the country, and a single vice-president, Francisco Holy, by means of who he governs when he is not present�

That clarifies everything. If Colombia has A SINGLE OFFICIAL PRESIDENT, this clear one that others are CALLED presidents but is not the PRESIDENT.

But many religions derived from the Christianity and our sacred writings when reading them, seem to enter the mental blindness.  They read thousands of times in our sagradas writings that A SINGLE GOD exists.   In fact, the leader whom affirms to follow said clearly:

“This is the eternal life, that knows the ONLY TRUE GOD you, and to that one to that your you have sent� (Juan 17:3)

Jesus then, declared without hairs in the language which all the other Jews of their time knew of memory and repeated every Saturday in the synagog: “Listening oh Israel, Yahweh our God, Yahweh is ONE�

These people also read that Moises was called God in the writings:

“Take into account said the Gentleman to him to Moisés that I put to you by God before the Pharaoh. Your brother Aaron will be your prophet.� (Exodus 7:1)

To anybody in his healthy judgment it would be happened to deduce to him:

1 - Moisès is Yahweh, and both they are in fact a single person.

2 - Yahweh, Moises and Aaron are a single person, but in fact they are three.

Clear that no! Our All-powerful Mr. Yahweh said clearly he would put that it by God, that is who would act as of God. But God, thus, without no other explanation, we say the GOD, only talks about one: to the God of Israel, the Father, Yahweh

Also of some judges of Israel it says the Bible:

I said: “You are Gods, and all are children of the Highest one.� (Psalms 82:6)

We must conclude that the princes of Israel were all one next to God? Sure that no. Simply the own God clarified that they were called thus.

That understands any person to it of any religion derived from the Christianity: he is evangelical, witness of Jehovah or catholic.

But these people when they read that the Bible calls God to the human being who we followed like leader, to Jesus de Nazareth the Jew, then they draw disparatadas conclusions:

1 - Jesus and God are the same person.

2-Jesus is “a God� that is to say, a deity of smaller rank, but “a God� as Yahweh the Father of.

3 - Jesus, the Father and the Spirit Santo are each God, but there is three Gods, but no one only.

The Bible says in Isaìas 9:6 that the future Mesìas that nacerìa, WOULD BE CALLED “Strong God�. Notese that says SERIOUS CALL, in future and name. It does not say IS a STRONG GOD, because Jesùs not yet existed, had not been born at the time of being written the book of Isaiah. But Isaiah says: “Strong God will be called�.

And in a pair of texts of the New Testament it seems that God was called to Jesus although they are not absolutely clear. Nevertheless he is correct to say that Jesus (like Moises, or the own devil that is called “the God of this world�) is called God, because God is in the governor writings synonymous, representative of the true God or somebody that it tries to be God (in that case, a false God)

But I to it do not say, says to the apostle Pablo to it:

We see in several translations… what you must to explain brother Pablo to us?

The Bible of the Americas (© 1997 Lockman)
Because although there are some Gods calls, or in the sky or the Earth, since by the way there are many Gods and many gentlemen, the New Bible of the Hispanics (© 2005 Lockman)
Because although there are some Gods calls, or in the sky or the Earth, since by the way there are many Gods and many gentlemen, Queen Valera (1909)
Because although there are some are called Gods, either in the sky, or in the Earth (since there are many Gods and many gentlemen), Sagradas Scriptures (1569)
Because although there are some are called Gods, or in the sky, or the Earth (since there are many Gods and many gentlemen),

Aha. That is that in fact is certain that there are many Gods in the sky or the Earth, because THEY ARE CALLED thus… but in fact for us the Christians whichever Gods are brother Pablo?

The Bible of the Americas (© 1997 Lockman)
nevertheless, for us there is a single God, the Father, from whom all the things come and we are for; and a Gentleman, Jesus Christ, by whom they are all the things and by means of which we existed we. The New Bible of the Hispanics (© 2005 Lockman)
but for us there is a single God, the Father, from whom all the things come and we are for; and a single Gentleman, Jesus Christ, by whom they are all the things and by means of we existed. Valera reigns (1909)
We however do not have more of a God, the Father, of who they are all the things, and we in him: and Mr. Jesus Christ, by which they are all the things, and we by him. Sagradas Scriptures (1569)
we, nevertheless, do not have a God, the Father more, of who they are all the things, and we in him; and Mr., Jesus, the Christ, by which they are all the things, and we by him.

But, he excuses to brother Pablo… Is not the spirit santo also our God?

I REPEAT: we do not have a God, the Father more, of who they are all the things, and we in him;

But… it excuses that it insists… Is not Jesus Christ our God?

I REPEAT: we do not have a God, the Father more, of who they are all the things, and we in e

That is that we true them Christian only accepted to a GOD by nature no matter how hard others, as Jesus, can sometimes be called Gods?

I REPEAT: we do not have a God, the Father more, of who they are all the things, and we in him;

Thanks brother Pablo.

And thanks are to Yahweh to have written a so clear book, that this time has been darkened by the iniquitous spirits all. The own Jesus has been the main defender of the monotheism, never affirmed to be Earth God, never asked that adoraramos to another one but that to its father.

For us, the Christians, there is A SINGLE GOD, not three.

For us, the Christians, the FATHER, not is A SINGLE GOD the son nor the spirit santo, who if they exist but are different things and nonparts from a compound deity. Jesus is the human son of God, born in the Earth does about 2000 years, not an angel that under the sky. And the spirit santo is the energy by which God creates the things. It is a force, not a person.

And to that to afir the opposite to me, not I, not Christian them, not WE, but they declare it to the WRITINGS lying.

Amen.

Tags: ,

This site helps the Internet run smoothly with Add Nofollow.

Home | Sitemap | Contact us | Copyright © 2010 www.newjoydivine.org All rights reserved.

kate moss , , , ,